Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
От | Tony Lausin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 296cdcaf0604301214t17c4bb49x20f9a6c25d740b8d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? (David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Very odd. I had always heard that MySql (at least originally) was a > "quick and dirty" database, easy to use, not fully standards compliant, > and not enterprise grade. Postgresql on the other hand was always > the heavyweight, standards compliant, enterprise db, which was more > difficult to use and set up but much more resilient. Postgresql has been > getting more UI support (often seen as a user friendly bonus) and > things like autovacuum support so that it is easier to use out of the box, > and MySql has been gaining standards compliance and resilience. > > Funny how perceptions can differ. Hi David, I think it's very odd too, cause that's the exact same perception of MySQL I have. My experience with MySQL is really limited to my Wordpress blog, and that means I've never actually designed a database with it. I wonder how much of this is just marketing and hype - either on the side of MySQL or the side of Oracle.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: