Re: [SQL] So what happens at 2GB?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SQL] So what happens at 2GB? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29692.921433699@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-sql |
: "Brett W. McCoy" <bmccoy@lan2wan.com> > On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Karl Denninger wrote: >>>>>> No. It works properly. I have had tables exceeding 10GB. >>>> >>>> How does it get past an operating system limitation on file size? >> >> There isn't one on FreeBSD, but Postgres doesn't seem to know that. >> Instead, it breaks the table up into 2G-sized file chunks. > > It may do that for performance reasons, I would guess, or for > compatibility with other operating systems that have the limitation Precisely. There was in fact a bug report against 6.4, that the feature failed to work correctly on some OS's because the split point was *exactly* 2Gb; apparently what works on these platforms is files less than 2Gb, not files less-than-or-equal-to 2Gb. 6.5 will break tables into chunks a tad smaller than 2Gb in order to avoid this problem; you might want to alter the RELSEG_SIZE constant in /users/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/storage/smgr/md.c to do the same in 6.4. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: