Re: missing isinf declaration on solaris

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 9/24/14 9:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Agreed, but what about non-GCC compilers?

> Stick AC_PROG_CC_C99 into configure.in.

I think that's a bad idea, unless you mean to do it only on Solaris.
If we do that unconditionally, we will pretty much stop getting any
warnings about C99-isms on modern platforms.  I am not aware that
there has been any agreement to move our portability goalposts up
to C99.
        regards, tom lane