Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2958651.1619667578@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > I was now able to reproduce the problem again, and I'm afraid that the > bug I hit is likely separate from Tom's. Yeah, I think so --- the symptoms seem quite distinct. My score so far today on the G4 is: 12 error-free regression test cycles on b3ee4c503 (plus one more with shared_buffers set to 16MB, on the strength of your previous hunch --- didn't fail for me though) HEAD failed on the second run with the same symptom as before: 2021-04-28 22:57:17.048 EDT [50479] FATAL: inconsistent page found, rel 1663/58183/69545, forknum 0, blkno 696 2021-04-28 22:57:17.048 EDT [50479] CONTEXT: WAL redo at 4/B72D408 for Heap/INSERT: off 77 flags 0x00; blkref #0: rel 1663/58183/69545,blk 696 FPW This seems to me to be pretty strong evidence that I'm seeing *something* real. I'm currently trying to isolate a specific commit to pin it on. A straight "git bisect" isn't going to work because so many people had broken so many different things right around that date :-(, so it may take awhile to get a good answer. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: