Re: Autovacuum cancellation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum cancellation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29572.1193359122@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum cancellation (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum cancellation
Re: Autovacuum cancellation |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Can autovacuum actually get into a hard deadlock? It can certainly be part of a deadlock loop, though the practical cases might be few. It will be holding more than one lock, eg a lock on its target table and various transient locks on system catalogs, and other processes taking or trying for exclusive locks on those things could create issues. I think it's OK to leave the issue go for now, until we see if anyone hits it in practice --- I just wanted to mention that we might need to consider the problem in future. > I think there's a window where the process waiting directly on > autovacuum could have already fired its deadlock check before it was > waiting directly on autovacuum. I think you don't understand what that code is doing. If there's an autovac anywhere in the dependency graph, it'll find it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: