Re: trailing comment ghost-timing
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: trailing comment ghost-timing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29569.1388280059@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: trailing comment ghost-timing (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: trailing comment ghost-timing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2013-12-24 12:27:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> What I was proposing was that we do include comments in what we send, >> as long as those comments are embedded in the statement text, not >> on lines before it. > The common way I've seen what I've described above done as is something > like: > /* File:path/to/some/file.whatever Function:foo::something() > * Comment: Expensive, but that's ok! > */ > SELECT here_comes FROM my WHERE some_sql; > If I unerstood what you propose correctly, we'd now drop that comment, > where we sent it before? Yeah. But I just noticed that this would cause the regression test results to change dramatically --- right now, most "-- comment" comments get echoed to the output, and that would stop. So maybe it's not such a great idea after all. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: