Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2954.941924013@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I'm betting that something in the array code is somehow bypassing the > normal table lookup mechanism, and is managing to see the underlying > temp-table name that should be hidden from it. Will look further... Yup, here it is, in parse_target.c: /* * If there are subscripts on the target column, prepare an * array assignment expression. This will generatean array value * that the source value has been inserted into, which can then * be placed in the new tupleconstructed by INSERT or UPDATE. * Note that transformArraySubscripts takes care of type coercion. */ if (indirection) { Attr *att = makeNode(Attr); Node *arrayBase; ArrayRef *aref; att->relname = pstrdup(RelationGetRelationName(rd)->data); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Next question is what to do about it --- the original table name doesn't seem to be conveniently available in this routine. A quick search for other uses of RelationGetRelationName shows other places that may have related bugs. Possibly, temprel.c needs to provide a reverse-lookup routine that will give back the user name of a table that might be a temp table? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: