Re: atrocious update performance
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: atrocious update performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 294.1079476193@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: atrocious update performance ("Rosser Schwarz" <rschwarz@totalcardinc.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: atrocious update performance
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Rosser Schwarz" <rschwarz@totalcardinc.com> writes: > Having never more than glanced at the output of "vacuum verbose", I > can't say whether that makes the cut for oodles. My suspicion is no. Nope, it sure doesn't. We occasionally see people who don't know they need to vacuum regularly and have accumulated hundreds or thousands of dead tuples for every live one :-(. That's clearly not the issue here. I'm fresh out of ideas, and the fact that this is a live server kinda limits what we can do experimentally ... but clearly, *something* is very wrong. Well, when you don't know what to look for, you still have to look. One possibly useful idea is to trace the kernel calls of the backend process while it does that ridiculously long EXPLAIN --- think you could try that? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: