Re: PATCH: pg_restore parallel-execution-deadlock issue
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PATCH: pg_restore parallel-execution-deadlock issue |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 29376.1464298553@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PATCH: pg_restore parallel-execution-deadlock issue (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PATCH: pg_restore parallel-execution-deadlock issue
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> ea274b2 has changed the way disconnection is done is is now closing
> both the read and write pipes. So you may want to retry if things get
> better with the next round of minor releases.
Hadn't paid attention to this thread before ...
It looks like there are still a few things we need to deal with before
considering Armin's submission resolved:
1. Armin proposes using "shutdown(pipeWrite, SD_BOTH)" where the code
committed this morning (df8d2d8c4) has "closesocket(pipeWrite)".
I'd prefer to leave it that way since it's the same as for the Unix case,
and Kyotaro-san says it works for him. Is there a reason we'd need
shutdown() instead?
2. Armin proposes that WaitForTerminatingWorkers needs to do CloseHandle()
on the various thread handles. That sounds plausible but I don't know
enough Windows programming to know if it really matters.
3. Should we replace ExitThread() with _endthreadex()? Again, it
seems plausible but I'm not the person to ask.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: