Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29362.1170817637@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? ("Karen Hill" <karen_hill22@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Karen Hill" <karen_hill22@yahoo.com> writes: > On Feb 5, 9:33 pm, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote: >> I think you have omitted a bunch of relevant facts. > The postgres version is 8.2.1 on Windows. The pl/pgsql function is > inserting to an updatable view (basically two tables). > [ sketch of schema ] I think the problem is probably buried in the parts you left out. Can you show us the full schemas for those tables, as well as the rule definition? The plpgsql function itself can certainly go a lot faster than what you indicated. On my slowest active machine: regression=# create table viewfoo(x int); CREATE TABLE regression=# CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION functionFoo() RETURNS VOID AS $$ BEGIN FOR i in 1..200000 LOOP INSERT INTO viewfoo (x) VALUES (i); END LOOP; END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql; CREATE FUNCTION regression=# \timing Timing is on. regression=# select functionFoo(); functionfoo ------------- (1 row) Time: 16939.667 ms regression=# regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: