Re: missing toast table for pg_policy
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: missing toast table for pg_policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29346.1518970729@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: missing toast table for pg_policy (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: missing toast table for pg_policy
Re: missing toast table for pg_policy |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > Is there really a compelling reason to not just create toast tables for > all system catalogs as in the attached? What happens when you VACUUM FULL pg_class? (The associated toast table would have to be nonempty for the test to prove much.) I'm fairly suspicious of toasting anything that the toast mechanism itself depends on, actually, and that would include at least pg_attribute and pg_index as well as pg_class. Maybe we could get away with it because there would never be any actual recursion only potential recursion ... but it seems scary. On the whole, I'm dubious that the risk/reward ratio is attractive here. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: