Re: pgindent run?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgindent run? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29324.985275384@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgindent run? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgindent run?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes: > cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these > indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job > of obfuscating the code changes. >> >> I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an >> incremental basis, but only once per release cycle. That at least >> lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle. > What about having it happen on every CVS commit? Try that and you'll get all-out war. It's tough enough keeping in sync with the repository already. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: