Re: ?linux distro?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ?linux distro? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2932.1135820774@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ?linux distro? (<operationsengineer1@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ?linux distro?
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
<operationsengineer1@yahoo.com> writes: > Randy, i saw the gentoo recommendation. my > understanding of gentoo is that it can take a long > time to compile (i think this term is used correctly) > programs, but when they are compiled, the programs are > optimized and noticeably faster than on comparable > systems. The real problem with Gentoo is their orientation towards "bleeding edge" rather than "stable". The idea of building your own version with your own weird combination of compiler flags that perhaps has never been tested by anybody else (certainly not the upstream developers of the software) is just one facet of this. Another is that Gentoo positively encourages you to put in poorly-tested hacks ... such as that CONNECT BY patch that they were still pushing for Postgres last I heard. Now "bleeding edge" is fine for a lot of purposes, but most people who are running a database server are probably more interested in "stable". If you'd like to think that somebody other than you has tested the combination of software that you are entrusting your valuable data to, then you should stay away from Gentoo. I think most people in the Postgres community who use Linux run Red Hat/CentOS/Fedora or Debian or SUSE. (ObDisclaimer: I work for Red Hat, so obviously I have a bias in this matter.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: