Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2929246.1637260744@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Yeah. I'm inclined to think we ought to just bite the bullet and fold > CLANG/CLANGXX into the main list of compiler switch probes, so that we > check every interesting one four times. After studying configure's list more closely, that doesn't seem like a great plan either. There's a lot of idiosyncrasy in the tests, such as things that only apply to C or to C++. More, I think (though this ought to be documented in a comment) that the policy is to not bother turning on extra -W options in the bitcode switches, on the grounds that warning once in the main build is enough. I follow that idea --- but what we missed is that we still need to turn *off* the warnings we're actively disabling. I shall go do that, if no objections. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: