Re: Commitfest II CLosed
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commitfest II CLosed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29265.1382368209@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commitfest II CLosed (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Commitfest II CLosed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes: > On 21.10.2013 16:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> What is the alternative? > If no-one really cares enough about a patch to review it, mark it as > "rejected, because no-one but the patch author cares". Harsh, but that's > effectively what pushing to the next commitfest means anyway. Well, that could be the problem, but it's also possible that no one could get to it in the alloted CF timeframe. Maybe the best-qualified reviewers were on vacation, or maybe there were just too many patches. I could see bouncing a patch on this basis if it doesn't get touched for, say, two consecutive CFs. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: