Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29232.1582152304@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare() (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2020-02-19 15:55:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Boy, I'd be pretty darn hesitant to go there, even with our new >> expectation of C99 compilers. What we found out when we last experimented >> with non-static inlines was that the semantics were not very portable nor >> desirable. I've forgotten the details unfortunately. > I think most of those problems were about putting extern inlines into > headers however - not about putting an inline onto an extern within one > translation unit only. Given that potential fallout should be within a > single file, and can fairly easily be fixed with adding wrappers etc, I > think it's a fairly low risk experiment to see what the buildfarm > thinks. The buildfarm would only tell you if it compiles, not whether the performance results are what you hoped for. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: