Re: Daterange question
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Daterange question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2922215.1705728907@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Daterange question (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Daterange question
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes: > On 1/19/24 20:08, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: >> This seems to do what I want: >> |NOT (drange << daterange(CURRENT_DATE, NULL, '[)'))| >> But this doesn't use the index. >> Any idea how to write a query so it uses the index on |drange|? > Without the full query and the EXPLAIN output I don't see that there is > much that can be offered in way of an answer. Well, we can definitively state that the NOT makes this unindexable. You need a WHERE clause that looks like indexed-column indexable-operator pseudo-constant which this isn't, nor does << have a negator operator that could allow the NOT to be simplified out. Wouldn't drange && daterange(CURRENT_DATE, NULL, '[)') serve the purpose? That should be indexable. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: