Re: Query/database optimization
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query/database optimization |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29157.1154488511@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Query/database optimization (Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <bofh@redwerk.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Query/database optimization
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <bofh@redwerk.com> writes: > [slow query] The bulk of your time seems to be going into this indexscan: > -> Index Scan using task_scheduler_icustomer_id on task_scheduler ts (cost=2.03..11.51rows=1 width=51) (actual time=2.785..2.785 rows=0 loops=4161) > Index Cond: ("outer".customer_id = ts.customer_id) > Filter: ((get_available_pages(task_id, customer_id) > 0) AND ((get_check_period(task_id,next_check) IS NULL) OR ((date_part('epoch'::text, get_check_period(task_id, next_check)) - date_part('epoch'::text,(timenow())::timestamp without time zone)) < 3600::double precision)) AND (status <> 1) AND ((((start_time)::timewith time zone < ('now'::text)::time(6) with time zone) AND ((stop_time)::time with time zone > ('now'::text)::time(6)with time zone)) OR ((start_time IS NULL) AND (stop_time IS NULL))) AND (NOT (hashed subplan))) > SubPlan > -> Unique (cost=2.02..2.03 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.617..0.631 rows=3loops=1) > ... I kinda doubt that the index search itself is that slow --- doubtless the problem comes from having to evaluate that filter condition on a lot of rows. How fast are those functions you're calling? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: