Re: procpid?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: procpid? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29136.1308152423@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: procpid? (Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Well, that would probably be a lot slower, and wouldn't necessarily >> deliver as consistent a snapshot of system activity. It's better to >> have one set-returning function that dumps out all the data in a >> single pass. > I wanted to address consistency issue in the previous mail, but then wanted > that to be left for later. > We can provide consistency the same way pg_locks provides; take a snapshot > on first request within a transaction, and reuse that snapshot for > subsequent calls. In this case we might want to go a bit finer grained by > providing a snapshot for every query. Quite honestly, the implementation mechanism used by the other statistics views is enormous overkill. I agree with Robert that I'm not eager to duplicate that for the activity view, when a simple SRF can get the job done. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: