Re: vacuum locking
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuum locking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29123.1066915615@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuum locking (Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: vacuum locking
Re: vacuum locking |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com> writes: > I think oracle does not do garbage collect, it overwrites the tuples directly > and stores the old tuples in undo buffers. Since most transactions are > commits, this is a big win. ... if all tuples are the same size, and if you never have any transactions that touch enough tuples to overflow your undo segment (or even just sit there for a long time, preventing you from recycling undo-log space; this is the dual of the VACUUM-can't-reclaim-dead-tuple problem). And a few other problems that any Oracle DBA can tell you about. I prefer our system. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: