Re: feature request - datum_compute_size and datum write_should be public
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: feature request - datum_compute_size and datum write_should be public |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29098.1328077783@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | feature request - datum_compute_size and datum write_should be public (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: feature request - datum_compute_size and datum
write_should be public
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > I looked to sources and I found a some useful routines for people who > write extensions and probably PL too. > There are datum_compute_size and datum_write from range_types.c. These > routines can be used in PL libs and maybe in other places. > Should be these routines moved to varlena.c and be public? Why? It is not common for types to contain other types, and it certainly isn't likely to happen without needing lots of other infrastructure --- the existing examples are arrays, records, and rangetypes, and all of those come with lots of baggage. And there are a number of choices in those functions that are pretty specific to rangetypes, as illustrated by the fact that they're not already sharing code with either arrays or records. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: