Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29072.1200099421@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes: > Note that we required that the "provider transaction" have the > attributes IsXactIsoLevelSerializable and XactReadOnly both being > true, so we have the mandates that the resultant backend process: > a) Is in read only mode, and > b) Is in serializable mode. If XactReadOnly were a "hard" read only constraint, that argument might be worth the electrons it's written on. I quote TFM: : When a transaction is read-only, the following SQL commands are : disallowed: INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, and COPY FROM if the table they : would write to is not a temporary table; all CREATE, ALTER, and DROP : commands; COMMENT, GRANT, REVOKE, TRUNCATE; and EXPLAIN ANALYZE and : EXECUTE if the command they would execute is among those listed. This is : a high-level notion of read-only that does not prevent all writes to : disk. ... and it doesn't prevent the need for a separate XID, either. Now I think someone was looking into a "hard" read only mode for use in doing read-only queries against a PITR slave; if that ever happens it might be adaptable to serve this purpose too. But we haven't got it today. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: