Re: Very vague pg_dump question ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Very vague pg_dump question ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29040.1120864779@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Very vague pg_dump question ... ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Very vague pg_dump question ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > I'm currently looking into a problem that a client is reporting that > pg_dump from 8.0.3 is 'skipping' one of their sequences ... I'm waiting > for more info, but am curious if anyone knows (or can think of?) any > reason why this might happen? The only thing I can think of is that the > sequence is owned by someone other then who the database is being dump'd > as, and has no permissions to 'read' it ... but anything I'm not thinking > of? AFAIK, a permissions problem would result in a pretty obvious error message from pg_dump ... though it's certainly possible for someone to ignore that, especially if they are running pg_dump noninteractively. Skipping in what sense --- no DDL, no setval, both? Is this a separately created sequence or a SERIAL sequence? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: