Re: Subquery WHERE IN or WHERE EXISTS faster?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Subquery WHERE IN or WHERE EXISTS faster?
Дата
Msg-id 29009.1214668423@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Subquery WHERE IN or WHERE EXISTS faster?  (Ulrich <ulrich.mierendorff@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Subquery WHERE IN or WHERE EXISTS faster?  (Ulrich <ulrich.mierendorff@gmx.net>)
Re: Subquery WHERE IN or WHERE EXISTS faster?  ("Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Список pgsql-performance
Ulrich <ulrich.mierendorff@gmx.net> writes:
> People say that [EXISTS is faster]

People who say that are not reliable authorities, at least as far as
Postgres is concerned.  But it is always a bad idea to extrapolate
results on toy tables to large tables --- quite aside from measurement
noise and caching issues, the planner might pick a different plan when
faced with large tables.  Load up a realistic amount of data and then
see what you get.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ulrich
Дата:
Сообщение: Subquery WHERE IN or WHERE EXISTS faster?
Следующее
От: Moritz Onken
Дата:
Сообщение: Planner should use index on a LIKE 'foo%' query