Re: New Oracle system in our house, migration chances
От | Achilleas Mantzios |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New Oracle system in our house, migration chances |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28f5dfe5-fdf6-5d25-8fbf-77075a55a28c@matrix.gatewaynet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New Oracle system in our house, migration chances (Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: New Oracle system in our house, migration chances
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On 13/1/22 4:51 μ.μ., Thomas Kellerer wrote: > Julien Rouhaud schrieb am 13.01.2022 um 15:13: >> I would go with option A if possible. If you want to get an idea of how >> complicated a migration would be, ora2pg does have a migration cost assessment >> report [1]. It can even check the queries if you have the audit trail enabled >> on your oracle database (if that existed in that version). >> > I second this. Option A) is much cleaner. In my experience compatibility layers > that promise that "System A" behaves exactly like "System B" also introduce > a lot of additional problems. And if something goes wrong, you can never be sure > which part causes the problem. Thanks, of course I agree with the last sentence. > > > -- Achilleas Mantzios DBA, Analyst, IT Lead IT DEPT Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: