Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
От | Vivek Khera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28EEAFE6-22FA-4CC3-81BC-45E14CD530CA@khera.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs (Ron Peacetree <rjpeace@earthlink.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Apr 25, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Ron Peacetree wrote: > ...and even if you do buy Intel, =DON"T= buy Dell unless you like > causing trouble for yourself. > Bad experiences with Dell in general and their poor PERC RAID > controllers in specific are all over this and other DB forums. I don't think that their current controllers suck like their older ones did. That's what you'll read about in the archives -- the old stuff. Eg, the 1850's embedded RAID controller really flies, but it only works with the internal disks. I can't comment on the external array controller for the 1850, but I cannot imagine it being any slower. And personally, I've not experienced any major problems aside from two bad PE1550's 4 years ago. And I have currently about 15 Dell servers running 24x7x365 doing various tasks, including postgres. However, my *big* databases always go on dual opteron boxes. my current favorite is the SunFire X4100 with an external RAID.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: