Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL
От
Turner, Ian
Тема
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id
28A4DB436106924BADF219EA31CE80AEF4BAD8@mailnyc2.nyc.deshaw.com
Ответ на
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and
PostgreSQL (Peter Eisentraut)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL "Turner, Ian" <Ian.Turner@deshaw.com>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and
PostgreSQL Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and
PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL "Turner, Ian" <Ian.Turner@deshaw.com>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL "Turner, Ian" <Ian.Turner@deshaw.com>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL "Turner, Ian" <Ian.Turner@deshaw.com>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Kerberos authentication, Active Directory, and PostgreSQL Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Tom Lane: > I'd be inclined to just s/2000/32767/ and not bother with a symbol, Heikki Linnakangas: > The corresponding limit in pg_SSPI_recvauth() probably needs to be > raised too.. Magnus Hagander: > Actually, I found a note that said it's recommended to never increase > it [above] 65535 - so perhaps we should put our limit at that instead > [of] 32767? Perhaps the thing to do is to use a symbol, set its value to 65535, and use= the same symbol for all of GSS, SSPI, and KRB5. --Ian
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата: