Re: postgres_fdw user mapping and role inheritance
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres_fdw user mapping and role inheritance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28968.1437155945@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres_fdw user mapping and role inheritance (Natalie Wenz <nataliewenz@ebureau.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres_fdw user mapping and role inheritance
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Natalie Wenz <nataliewenz@ebureau.com> writes: > Oh! Of course! The local database doesn't know anything about the role privileges on the remote database, so the informationisn't even available on the local database to somehow take the union of all the privileges of foo and bar becausethey are defined on the remote database. Thanks for responding. I got so wrapped up in our simple use case (whereany individual_user in the local_group would connect to foreign_server as the same foreign_user) and couldn't comeup with a counter example. > For our use case, can you think of any other way to do it besides creating a user mapping for every member of local_group?Gilberto's suggestion of setting the session authorization (I think?) won't work because the individual_usersdon't have privileges to set that. ("ERROR: permission denied to set session authorization") Would it work for them to do SET ROLE to the group whose mapping they want to use? IIRC that's allowed for any member of the group. The problem with this is that their privileges for local operations are also affected, so maybe that doesn't help you. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: