Re: Dumping roles improvements?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dumping roles improvements? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28964.1318450901@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dumping roles improvements? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dumping roles improvements?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > On 10/11/11 9:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I don't find this terribly convincing. I can see the rationales for two >> endpoint cases: (1) restore these objects into exactly the same >> ownership/permissions environment that existed before, and (2) restore >> these objects with the absolute minimum of ownership/permissions >> assumptions. The latter case seems to me to be covered already by >> --no-owner --no-privileges. > But what I'm asking for is (1). The problem is that the roles don't > ship in the per-database pgdump file. In that case you do "pg_dumpall -r" first and then pg_dump your individual database. I thought you were looking for something that would dump only roles referenced in the particular database, which is why it sounded like an intermediate case. I know that the division of labor between pg_dumpall and pg_dump could use rethinking, but it needs to be actually rethought, in toto, not hacked one minor feature at a time. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: