Re: Add two missing tests in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl
От | Drouvot, Bertrand |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add two missing tests in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2894687f-141d-85a9-e8c3-2151e5b7e662@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add two missing tests in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add two missing tests in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 5/6/23 4:10 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 7:53 PM Drouvot, Bertrand > <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 5/5/23 2:28 PM, Amit Kapila wrote: >>> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 5:36 PM Drouvot, Bertrand >> >> So, even on a successful test, we can see that the WAL file we expect to be removed on the standby has not been recycledon the primary before the test. >> > > Okay, one possibility of not removing on primary is that at the time > of checkpoint (when we compute RedoRecPtr), the wal_swtich and insert > is not yet performed because in that case it will compute the > RedoRecPtr as a location before those operations which would be 0000*3 > file. However, it is not clear how is that possible except from a > background checkpoint happening at that point but from LOGs, it > appears that the checkpoint triggered by test has recycled the wal > files. > >>> I think we need to add more DEBUG info to find that >>> out. Can you please try to print 'RedoRecPtr', '_logSegNo', and >>> recptr? >>> >> >> Yes, will do. >> > > Okay, thanks, please try to print similar locations on standby in > CreateRestartPoint(). > The extra information is displayed that way: https://github.com/bdrouvot/postgres/commit/a3d6d58d105b379c04a17a1129bfb709302588ca#diff-c1cb3ab2a19606390c1a7ed00ffe5a45531702ca5faf999d401c548f8951c65bR6822-R6830 https://github.com/bdrouvot/postgres/commit/a3d6d58d105b379c04a17a1129bfb709302588ca#diff-c1cb3ab2a19606390c1a7ed00ffe5a45531702ca5faf999d401c548f8951c65bR7269-R7271 https://github.com/bdrouvot/postgres/commit/a3d6d58d105b379c04a17a1129bfb709302588ca#diff-c1cb3ab2a19606390c1a7ed00ffe5a45531702ca5faf999d401c548f8951c65bR7281-R7284 There is 2 runs with this extra info in place: A successful one: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6528745436086272 A failed one: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4558139312308224 For both the testrun.zip is available in the Artifacts section. Sharing this now in case you want to have a look (I'll have a look at them early next week on my side). Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: