Re: Updating system catalogs after a tuple deletion
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updating system catalogs after a tuple deletion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28930.989896244@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Updating system catalogs after a tuple deletion (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes: > Actually this brings up a problem I'm having with ALTER TABLE ADD > CONSTRAINT and since it mostly affects you with DROP CONSTRAINT, I'll > bring it up here. If you have a table that has check constraints or > is inherited from multiple tables, what's the correct way to name an > added constraint that's being inherited? If it's $2 in the parent, > but the child already has a $2 defined, what should be done? The > reason this affects drop constraint is knowing what to drop in the > child. If you drop $2 on the parent, what constraint(s) on the child > get dropped? Seems like depending on the name is inadequate. Perhaps a column should be added to pg_relcheck to show that a constraint has been inherited. Maybe "rcinherit" = OID of parent's equivalent constraint, or 0 if constraint was not inherited. Then you could do the right things without making any assumptions about constraint names being the same. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: