Re: [INTERFACES] pg_pwd
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] pg_pwd |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28767.943138678@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] pg_pwd (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] pg_pwd
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > And yes, this IS a glaring security hole, IF the user postgres has a postgres > password. Just WHY is pg_pwd mode 666 in the first place?? Because it's written out with a backend-side COPY operation, and backend-side COPY makes *every* file it creates mode 666. As I commented earlier in this thread, I think COPY ought not create files with looser permissions than 644 (does anyone know why that's not true already?). But that still wouldn't be good enough for pg_pwd. Maybe it would be worthwhile to try to force pg_pwd in particular to be written with just mode 600. In the standard configuration that shouldn't make any difference ... but if people are going to use hacked-up initdb code, as you evidently are doing, we probably should not rely on the data directory to be locked up tightly... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: