Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2875.1511646362@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Generational memory allocator
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
I wrote: > Instead I propose that we should make sure that the palloc request size > for XLogReaderState->main_data is always maxalign'd. The existing > behavior in DecodeXLogRecord of palloc'ing it only just barely big > enough for the current record seems pretty brain-dead performance-wise > even without this consideration. Generally, if we need to enlarge > that buffer, we should enlarge it significantly, IMO. I've confirmed that the attached is sufficient to stop the valgrind crash on my machine. But as I said, I think we should be more aggressive at resizing the buffer, to reduce resize cycles. I'm inclined to start out with a buffer size of 128 or 256 or so bytes and double it when needed. Anybody have a feeling for a typical size for the "main data" part of a WAL record? regards, tom lane diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlogreader.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlogreader.c index aeaafed..4840b0e 100644 *** a/src/backend/access/transam/xlogreader.c --- b/src/backend/access/transam/xlogreader.c *************** DecodeXLogRecord(XLogReaderState *state, *** 1279,1285 **** { if (state->main_data) pfree(state->main_data); ! state->main_data_bufsz = state->main_data_len; state->main_data = palloc(state->main_data_bufsz); } memcpy(state->main_data, ptr, state->main_data_len); --- 1279,1285 ---- { if (state->main_data) pfree(state->main_data); ! state->main_data_bufsz = MAXALIGN(state->main_data_len); state->main_data = palloc(state->main_data_bufsz); } memcpy(state->main_data, ptr, state->main_data_len);
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: