Re: Not an error but a difficult wording
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Not an error but a difficult wording |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2873117.1674697141@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Not an error but a difficult wording (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Not an error but a difficult wording
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes: > On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 08:22 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> Maybe this would be better? (I don't know the comma rules) >> "because the files(,?) that are generated/processed by these tools(,?) are >> already included in the tarball" > +1 > Correct English would be: > These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because > the files generated by these tools are included in the tarball. The existing wording is not incorrect AFAICS, but I agree it's a bit awkward. I'd modify one word in your version: These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because the files generated using these tools are included in the tarball. Or possibly "with" instead of "using"? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: