Re: Not an error but a difficult wording

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Not an error but a difficult wording
Дата
Msg-id 2873117.1674697141@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Not an error but a difficult wording  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Ответы Re: Not an error but a difficult wording  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Список pgsql-docs
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes:
> On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 08:22 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> Maybe this would be better? (I don't know the comma rules)
>> "because the files(,?) that are generated/processed by these tools(,?) are
>> already included in the tarball"

> +1

> Correct English would be:

>   These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because
>   the files generated by these tools are included in the tarball.

The existing wording is not incorrect AFAICS, but I agree it's a bit
awkward.  I'd modify one word in your version:

  These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because
  the files generated using these tools are included in the tarball.

Or possibly "with" instead of "using"?

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Not an error but a difficult wording
Следующее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Not an error but a difficult wording