Re: [BUGS] BUG #4599: bugfix for contrib/dblink module
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #4599: bugfix for contrib/dblink module |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28719.1230996378@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #4599: bugfix for contrib/dblink module (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #4599: bugfix for contrib/dblink module
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: > On line 795 below, fail should get set to PG_GETARG_BOOL(1). However, as > line 842 is about to be executed, fail is still set to true, even though > PG_GETARG_BOOL(1) is clearly false. Any ideas? I can't duplicate that here, but my first reaction on studying this code is "ick!". Having a non-set-returning function calling the SRF infrastructure (and not bothering to clean it up on exit, either) is just horrid --- I have no idea what side-effects that might have, but at the very least there's going to be a memory leak. Trying to implement three significantly different functions as one function with a maze of if's is not good style in any case. I think you should break those three functions apart. There is no value in having send_query share any code with the others. It might be feasible to have the other two share a subroutine that collects the result data. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: