Re: Generating config stuff from single source
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Generating config stuff from single source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28555.1140105139@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Generating config stuff from single source (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Generating config stuff from single source
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006 02:50 schrieb Tom Lane: >> That's fine for users, but what new demands are you about to place on >> developers? Does this require tools not already needed in order to >> build from a CVS pull? (There's sure no xsltproc on this machine...) > It is to be expected that sooner or later we'll move from SGML to XML > documentation builds, at which point xsltproc will become a semi-requirement > anyway. I don't think this requirement is too onerous; libxslt is portable > and easy to install. Forgot to mention, but: I don't find the above argument very convincing. The buildfarm machines are not expected to build documentation, and many developers seem not to have installed doc tools either. So I think this would be raising the bar another notch in terms of what's required to do development or testing, even if it does overlap with docs-build needs. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: