Re: HP-UX shared library installation is incorrect
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: HP-UX shared library installation is incorrect |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28540.1040612128@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | HP-UX shared library installation is incorrect (Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: HP-UX shared library installation is incorrect
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au> writes: > 1. the libraries are installed with their base names such as > 'libpq.sl' being regular files, with versioned names being > symbolic links to the base names: > This should be the other way around: Probably so. I had not realized that HP's linker is affected by which way the symlinks run, but it appears that it is. > 2. the versioned names are possibly incorrect: 'libpq.sl.2' should be > 'libpq.2' by analogy to the libc example above. This I disagree with: I consider HP's naming convention ugly and misleading. ".sl" should be in the name *somewhere*. The open-source libraries I have on my machine seem to mostly put the version number after .sl, eg lrwxrwxrwx 1 gnu users 14 Apr 27 2000 libgdbm.sl@ -> libgdbm.sl.2.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 gnu users 14 Apr 27 2000 libgdbm.sl.2@ -> libgdbm.sl.2.0 -r-xr-xr-x 1 gnu users 45203 Nov 18 1999 libgdbm.sl.2.0* I'd be in favor of following this convention. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: