Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28506.1157666811@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Re: log_duration is redundant, no? Re: log_duration is redundant, no? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes: > I mean: > log_duration = on > log_min_duration_statement = 500 > would log only duration for queries faster than 500 ms and duration + > query text for queries slower than 500ms (we can easily avoid > redundancy). I don't find this very persuasive --- it sounds awfully messy, and in fact isn't that exactly the old behavior we got rid of because no one could understand it? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: