Re: postgres_fdw: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA ... LIMIT TO (partition)
От | Bernd Helmle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres_fdw: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA ... LIMIT TO (partition) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 284a4f9c571fb189a4e8148a31570f288153737d.camel@oopsware.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres_fdw: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA ... LIMIT TO (partition) (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres_fdw: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA ... LIMIT TO (partition)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am Mittwoch, dem 24.03.2021 um 17:32 +0100 schrieb Bernd Helmle: > > Yes, but it should be noted that the main reason that was mentioned > > as > > a reason to exclude partitions is to not cause table catalog bloat, > > and I argue that this argument is not as solid in the case of the > > explicitly named tables of the LIMIT TO clause. Except if SQL > > standard > > prescribes otherwise, I think allowing partitions in LIMIT TO > > clauses > > is an improvement overall. > > Don't get me wrong, i find this useful, too. Especially because it's > a > very minor change in the code. And i don't see negative aspects here > currently, either (which doesn't mean there aren't some). Since there are currently no obvious objections i've marked this "Read for Committer". -- Thanks, Bernd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: