Am Mittwoch, dem 24.03.2021 um 17:32 +0100 schrieb Bernd Helmle:
> > Yes, but it should be noted that the main reason that was mentioned
> > as
> > a reason to exclude partitions is to not cause table catalog bloat,
> > and I argue that this argument is not as solid in the case of the
> > explicitly named tables of the LIMIT TO clause. Except if SQL
> > standard
> > prescribes otherwise, I think allowing partitions in LIMIT TO
> > clauses
> > is an improvement overall.
>
> Don't get me wrong, i find this useful, too. Especially because it's
> a
> very minor change in the code. And i don't see negative aspects here
> currently, either (which doesn't mean there aren't some).
Since there are currently no obvious objections i've marked this "Read
for Committer".
--
Thanks,
Bernd