Re: text search vs schemas
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: text search vs schemas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28488.1187327782@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: text search vs schemas (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: text search vs schemas
Re: text search vs schemas |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> Uh, no. Function names for example are subject to search-path >> confusion. > Wait, are they? They are in PL languages but only because most > languages store their source code as text just as is happening here. Hmmm ... if you look at the current solution for default expressions for serial columns, ie nextval() on a regclass constant, it's pretty schema-safe. So we could imagine inventing a regconfig datatype that is the same sort of wrapper-over-OID. Then make the 2-parameter form of to_tsvector take that type instead of text. That seems like it'd fix the problem for expression indexes on to_tsvector calls, but I don't see how it fixes the problem for triggers. We don't have any clear path for making trigger arguments be anything but a list of strings. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: