Re: CREATE/REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW planner difference?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE/REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW planner difference? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2847072.1622573465@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE/REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW planner difference? (Philip Semanchuk <philip@americanefficient.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE/REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW planner difference?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Philip Semanchuk <philip@americanefficient.com> writes: > I can confirm that it’s not waiting on a lock. In addition, through the AWS CPU utilization monitor I can see that theREFRESH uses one CPU/worker whereas the CREATE uses four. This is consistent with the EXPLAIN ANALYZE for the CREATE whichsays it uses four workers. Hm. I tried to reproduce this here, and in a simple test case I get parallelized plans for both CREATE and REFRESH. Are you sure the REFRESH is running with the same server parameter settings? >> also, can you share the plans where you see the diff. > Unless I misunderstand, there is no plan for a REFRESH. EXPLAIN isn't bright about that, but if you enable auto_explain, it will log the plan for a REFRESH's query. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: