Re: Application name patch - v2
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Application name patch - v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28467.1256138748@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Application name patch - v2 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Application name patch - v2
Re: Application name patch - v2 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> FWIW, I would prefer PGAPPNAME to PGAPPLICATIONNAME which is what > We don't usually use abbreviations, so how about PGCLIENTNAME or some such? Not sure I believe that argument. Among the set of existing libpq environment variables I see PGHOSTADDR PGSSLCERT PGSSLCRL PGKRBSRVNAME PGTZ PGSYSCONFDIR so it can hardly be said that there's a policy of avoiding abbreviations. PGCLIENTNAME would be better than PGAPPLICATIONNAME I guess, but I still prefer the other. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: