Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28443.1223334135@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text? (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text?
Re: Shouldn't pg_settings.enumvals be array of text? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes: > When I was looking at this code for the first time recently I thought the > same thing Tom did here--that this was kind of odd and it should give a > text array back instead. I would even volunteer to take a stab at writing > that change myself just to get some more practice with this section of > code, should be able to squeeze that in over the next month. Fine with me, but let's be sure this doesn't slide off the radar screen. If we forget about it and release 8.4 with the current definition of the column, it'll be too late to change it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: