Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2844.1254591650@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > OK, the reason I couldn't reproduce this for the life of me is that I > had PGCLIENTENCODING=UTF8 in the environment of the server(!). Once I > unset that, I could reproduce the problem. This could be made a bit > more well-defined if we ran pg_regress with --multibyte=something, > although that is then liable to fail in encodings that don't have an > equivalent of \u0080. Some with your suggestion above: It will only > work for some encodings. I'm back to wondering why we need a regression test for this at all. Wouldn't it be just as useful to be testing a character code that is well-defined everywhere? Or just drop this test altogether? It's already got way too many expected files for my taste. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: