Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect and hash indexes
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect and hash indexes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28437.1489781578@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect and hash indexes (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect and hash indexes
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> writes:
> Basically, when we started working on WAL for hash index, we found
> that WAL routine 'XLogReadBufferExtended' does not expect a page to be
> completely zero page else it returns Invalid Buffer. To fix this, we
> started initializing freed overflow page or new bucket pages using
> _hash_pageinit() which basically initialises page header portion but
> not it's special area where page type information is present. That's
> why you are seeing an ERROR saying 'page is not a hash page'. Actually
> pageinspect module needs to handle this type of page. Currently it is
> just handling zero pages but not an empty pages. I will submit a patch
> for this.
That seems like entirely the wrong approach. You should make the special
space valid, instead, so that tools like pg_filedump can make sense of
the page.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: