Re: Exclusive Locks Taken on User Tables?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Exclusive Locks Taken on User Tables?
Дата
Msg-id 28413.1194379307@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Exclusive Locks Taken on User Tables?  (Marc <pgsql-general@mbreslow.net>)
Ответы Re: Exclusive Locks Taken on User Tables?  ("Marc Breslow" <marc@mbreslow.net>)
Список pgsql-general
Marc <pgsql-general@mbreslow.net> writes:
> This is the query that I'm running to view locks:
> SELECT pg_class.relname AS table,
>        pg_database.datname AS database,
>        transaction, pid, mode, granted
>  FROM pg_locks, pg_class, pg_database
> WHERE pg_locks.relation = pg_class.oid
>   AND pg_locks.database = pg_database.oid
> ORDER BY pg_class.relname, mode

> I'm pretty sure this filters out transactionid lock types because I'm
> joining to pg_database and pg_class.  Pls correct me if I'm wrong though.

It won't filter out row-level locks on rows within tables.  You're
probably looking at a transient row lock taken by a blocked SELECT FOR
UPDATE.  You didn't show exactly what the real problem was, but I'm
wondering if this is foreign-key conflicts in a pre-8.1 PG version.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Scott Marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Syntax error in a large COPY
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Syntax error in a large COPY