plpython versus gcc 4.5.x
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | plpython versus gcc 4.5.x |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28249.1295721528@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: plpython versus gcc 4.5.x
Re: plpython versus gcc 4.5.x |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Buildfarm members bobcat (Fedora 14 x86) and frogmouth (mingw) have been showing an assertion failure in the plpython regression tests since this patch went in: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=740e54c I have been able to reproduce the problem locally on Fedora 14 x86_64. The common thread appears to be use of gcc 4.5 --- Andrew says that frogmouth is using 4.5.0, and current F-14 has gcc 4.5.1. I have found that manually re-inlining PLy_procedure_input_conversion is sufficient to make the problem go away, as is reducing the optimization level below -O2. Based on these observations, I believe it's not our bug but an optimization bug in gcc, and have accordingly filed a gcc bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671899 However, it's hard to guess how long it might take for the gcc boys to provide a fix, and in any case I fear it will be a long time before the fix propagates to places like mingw. Given these facts, and the fact that the above-mentioned patch has no purpose other than code beautification, I recommend reverting the patch. We could just revert the de-inlining of PLy_procedure_input_conversion, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of point in having one separate and the other not. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: