Re: simplify register_dirty_segment()
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28214.1114493555@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() ("Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
> I can't figure out why it tooks so long time in windows and SunOS for clean
> files -
I told you why: they don't maintain bookkeeping information that allows
them to quickly identify dirty buffers belonging to a particular file.
Linux does ... but I'm not sure that makes it "smarter", since that
bookkeeping has a distributed cost, and the cost might or might not
be repaid in any particular system workload. It would be a reasonable
bet for a kernel designer to assume that fsync() is generally going to
have to wait for some I/O and so a bit of CPU overhead isn't really
going to matter.
> You are right. A possible (but not clean) solution is like this: The
> bgwriter maintain a refcount for each file. When the file is open,
> refcount++, when the file is closing, refcount--. When the refcount goes to
> zero, Bgwriter could safely remove it from its PendingOpsTable after
> checkpoint.
Adjusting such a global refcount would require global locks, which is
just what you were hoping to avoid :-(
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: