Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Дата
Msg-id 28182.1458700903@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
> My concern was not merely "academic" (i.e. it was not limited in scope
> to things that don't make B-Tree indexes corrupt). Pretty sure that we
> need to start thinking of this as a problem with strcoll() that
> strxfrm() does not have for more fundamental reasons, because
> strcoll() says that the first string in the de_DE sorted list is
> *greater* than the third string.

[ squint... ]  I was looking specifically for that sort of misbehavior
in my test program, and I haven't seen it.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)