Re: Mount options for Ext3?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mount options for Ext3? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28176.1043457408@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mount options for Ext3? (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mount options for Ext3?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com> writes: > I suspect the answer to that is that you can safely turn off fsync > only if the operating system will guarantee that write transactions > from a process are actually committed in the order they arrive from > that process. Yeah. We use fsync partly so that when we tell a client a transaction is committed, it really is committed (ie, down to disk) --- but also as a means of controlling write order. I strongly doubt that any modern filesystem will promise to execute writes exactly in the order issued, unless prodded by means such as fsync. > Otherwise you'd have to worry about write transactions > to the transaction log committing before the writes to the data files > during a savepoint, Actually, the other way around is the problem. The WAL algorithm works so long as log writes hit disk before the data-file changes they describe (that's why it's called write *ahead* log). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: